Chak Lam Coleman Wong vs Egor Agafonov Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
C. Lam Coleman Wong vs E. Agafonov

Chak Lam Coleman Wong

HKG

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

151

C. Rank

511

128

Best Rank

465

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$539.0K

Career Money

Plays

Egor Agafonov

RUS

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

151

C. Rank

511

128

Best Rank

465

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$539.0K

Career Money

Plays

Head-to-head: Wong 1 - 0 Agafonov

They have played 3 sets in total, with Chak Lam Coleman Wong winning 2 and Egor Agafonov winning 1. The last match between Chak Lam Coleman Wong and Egor Agafonov was at the Zhangjiagang Challenger, 27-08-2024, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Chak Lam Coleman Wong getting the victory 6-3 5-7 6-4.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Wong	1
Agafonov	0

Last 1 H2H Matches:

(R1) Zhangjiagang Challenger(08-27-24)

Stats

Chak Lam Coleman Wong

Egor Agafonov

C. L. C. Wong vs E. Agafonov H2H Profile

C. L. C. Wong	Stats	E. Agafonov
$538,970	Career Prize Money	$0
55.78% (164-130)	Career Total W/L	58.87% (146-102)
1	Hard	0
2	Titles	2
1	Total H2H Matches	0
45.45% (5-6)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

C. L. C. Wong vs E. Agafonov Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Chak Lam Coleman Wong has won 46.19% of points on their second serve, while Egor Agafonov has won 39.83%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Chak Lam Coleman Wong, in recent form, has won 45.31% of their opponent's second serve points, while Egor Agafonov has won 51.48%. The same stats for first serve returns are 23.26% and 24.45% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Chak Lam Coleman Wong has saved 52.23% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Egor Agafonov has saved 53.60% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Chak Lam Coleman Wong has won 51.61% of matches played (W/L 32/30), with Egor Agafonov winning 62.30% (W/L 38/23) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Chak Lam Coleman Wong has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 129/90), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 43% (W/L 6/8). Egor Agafonov has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 59% (W/L 30/15), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 53% (W/L 23/20).
Player level: In the last year, Chak Lam Coleman Wong has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 55.56% of matches (W/L 20/16), where as Egor Agafonov has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 73.17% of matches (W/L 30/11). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Chak Lam Coleman Wong winning 1 times and Egor Agafonov being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Chak Lam Coleman Wong winning 2 and Egor Agafonov winning 1.
The last match between Chak Lam Coleman Wong and Egor Agafonov was at the Zhangjiagang Challenger, 27-08-2024, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Chak Lam Coleman Wong getting the victory 6-3 5-7 6-4.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:10:33.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Chak Lam Coleman Wong has played against opponents with an average rank of 205.05 while Egor Agafonov has played against players with an average rank of 469.98.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Chak Lam Coleman Wong has won 42% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Egor Agafonov has won 53% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Chak Lam Coleman Wong has converted 33.56% of breakpoint opportunities, and Egor Agafonov has converted 36.07% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Chak Lam Coleman Wong vs Egor Agafonov Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

C. L. C. Wong vs E. Agafonov H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

C. L. C. Wong	Stats	E. Agafonov
1	H2H Matches Won	0
2	Sets Won	1
17	Games Won	14
7	Aces (Total)	5
3	Total Double Faults	5
2:10:33	Average Match Time	2:10:33
57% (56/98)	1st Serve %	69% (63/91)
68% (38/56)	1st Serve Win %	65% (41/63)
62% (26/42)	2nd Serve Win %	57% (16/28)
50% (3/6)	Break Pts Won %	50% (2/4)
37% (34/91)	Return Points Win %	35% (34/98)
100% (1/1)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	Deciding Set Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

C. L. C. Wong Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Taipei Challenger - 03-11-2025
SF James DuckworthJ. Duckworth	L	6-3 6-4	Stats
QF Maxime JanvierM. Janvier	W	6-4 6-4	Stats
R2 Tsung-Hao HuangT. Huang	W	6-4 6-4	Stats
R1 Luca CastelnuovoL. Castelnuovo	W	6-4 4-6 7-5	Stats
Seoul Challenger - 27-10-2025
F Sho ShimabukuroS. Shimabukuro	L	6-4 6-3	Stats

View All

E. Agafonov Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Manama 2 Challenger - 24-11-2025
R1 Mirza BasicM. Basic	L	6-4 6-1	Stats
Soma Bay Challenger - 17-11-2025
R1 Vadym UrsuV. Ursu	L	6-3 6-1	Stats
Seoul Challenger - 27-10-2025
Q1 Evan ZhuE. Zhu	L	6-1 5-7 7-6(6)	Stats
Suzhou Challenger - 20-10-2025
Q3 Tsung-Hao HuangT. Huang	L	7-5 6-4	Stats
Q1 Nitin Kumar SinhaN. Kumar	W	7-5 6-2	Stats

View All

C. L. C. Wong vs E. Agafonov Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

C. L. C. Wong	Stats	E. Agafonov
55.78% (164/130)	YTD Win/Loss	58.87% (146/102)
54.07% (372/316)	Sets Win/Loss	56.71% (321/245)
51.16% (3419/3264)	Games Win/Loss	52.23% (2758/2522)
58.90% (129/90)	Hard Win/Loss	58.13% (93/67)
46.51% (20/23)	Clay Win/Loss	53.49% (23/20)
50.00% (9/9)	Indoor Hard W/L	66.67% (30/15)
42.86% (6/8)	Grass Win/Loss	0% (0/0)
0.52	Aces Per Game	0.4
1687	Aces Total	1029
0.18	Double Faults Per Game	0.49
603	Total Double Faults	1270
1:31:40	Average Match Time	1:29:4
371.21	Average Opponent Rank	444.24
60% (11331/18739)	1st Serve %	62% (9620/15521)
71% (8054/11331)	1st Serve Win %	70% (6716/9620)
49% (3631/7408)	2nd Serve Win %	44% (2606/5901)
41% (703/1718)	Break Points Won % (Total)	43% (720/1656)
38% (7230/18830)	Return Points Win %	41% (6355/15515)
53.33% (8/7)	Slam W/L	0% (0/0)
46.67% (7/8)	Masters W/L	0% (0/0)
62.50% (5/3)	Cups W/L	0% (0/0)
27.27% (3/8)	Main Tour W/L	0% (0/0)
55.65% (69/55)	Challenger W/L	47.22% (17/19)
59.50% (72/49)	Futures W/L	60.85% (129/83)
55% (157/286)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	59% (141/237)
83% (5/6)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	25% (1/4)
55% (56/102)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	52% (38/73)
54% (51/94)	Deciding Set Win %	59% (43/73)
87% (157/136)	1st Set Won, Won Match	85% (135/115)
13% (157/21)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	14% (135/19)
20% (137/27)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	27% (113/30)